This article is also available in:
Русский (Russian) 
Uzbek
Uzbekistan has officially legalized the use of 3D markings on pedestrian crossings. This innovation has been included in the country’s Traffic Rules, and soon such crossings will appear on city streets, especially near schools and kindergartens. For now, these solutions can only be found in a few locations in some regions.
At first glance, the idea seems useful: 3D markings are designed to catch drivers’ attention and encourage them to reduce speed. However, experts are skeptical about whether this measure will actually be effective.
What Do Specialists Say?
Many specialists and drivers are critical of 3D markings. Here are the main concerns:
- Habituation Effect. Initially, 3D markings might be effective, but over time, drivers could get used to them and start ignoring them, just like regular crossings.
- Distraction Factor. Bright graphics may distract drivers, particularly in challenging driving conditions, poor lighting, or during rain.
- Durability and Cost. Such markings require higher-quality materials and periodic updates. If their durability is low, it will lead to additional expenses.
- Weather Conditions. In rain, snow, or fog, the 3D effect diminishes significantly, raising doubts about their effectiveness in real-world conditions.
What About Real Problems?
Some experts suggest that instead of implementing 3D markings, more effective measures could be prioritized, such as:
- Installing additional traffic lights and speed cameras.
- Improving the lighting of pedestrian crossings to make them visible at any time of day.
- Increasing fines for speeding near pedestrian zones.
- Adding speed bumps at hazardous road sections.
Final Thoughts
3D markings are undoubtedly an interesting and visually striking solution. However, if they turn out to be just another “decorative element” that fails to address real issues, they won’t contribute to improving road safety. When implementing such measures, it’s essential to remember that the priority is not the visual appeal but the actual protection of pedestrians’ lives and health.
What do you think? Can 3D markings change drivers’ behavior and make roads safer? Share your opinion in the comments below!
The article may contain inaccuracies as it is translated by AI. For more details, please refer to the Russian version of the article. If you notice any inaccuracies, you can send corrections via the Telegram bot: Uzvaibik_bot.
